An Analysis Of Shaffers Equus

An Analysis Of Shaffers genus genus genus genus EquusThe play is in two acts, the first consisting of twenty- ace the second of thirty-five photos. It is not realistic in that it includes flashbacks performed onstage (like a movie). However, it is an explanatory unmatched with Shaffers notes while represent. It is a play consisting of individuals rather than types. Each office has his/her individuality a large with his/her own perspective of life. We learn shoemakers lastly the characters from what other characters suppose approximately them from what they tell close to themselves as well as from Shaffers r depotering about(predicate) them within p atomic number 18ntheses. Although it is an open ended play it goes far from the lineer plot structure with its amazing climax. The forward and backward action of the play makes it a polar one. Moreover while the play has tongue when the time is present, it contains action when it is backward. It is a symbolic play and evoke b e called a journey into the mind of Alan Strang, a cardinal year honest-to-goodness boy. It analyzes Alans religious obsession with horse cavalrys which is based on his complicated feelings due to his religious background and his increasing sexual side as a teenager. This confusion of religion, in fact, is a consequence of some signals from his religious, middle-class sustain and his atheist, working-class gravel. Alans perception of religion and sexuality is conflicted and his way of praying amazes a revere of a horse spirit named Equus. He ends up with blinding six horses in the invariable because of the fact that they keep back watched him with a girl. Rosefeldt states that Equus is inspired by a real-life event of which the author had very little details. Someone told Shaffer about a boy who blinded horses (Rosefeldt 89). Equus, the horse gradually becomes a source of independence and worship for Alan. As he worships Equus rutately, Alan goes away from being normal.Th ere argon two main characters in the play, Martin Dysart and Alan Strang, the protagonist. While the play is Alans story, it soon becomes Dysarts story, in like manner. Dysart is a psychiatrist and is asked to treat Alan Strang. Dysart admits to treat Alan as a patient, believing his lawyer friend Hesther Salomon that the boy has something special. In strike I, the audiences learn that Alan comes from a Christian mother Dora Strang and an atheist father Frank Strang who have argument in agreeing how to raise Alan. Alans mother tries to impose religion on Alan and does not avoid talking about sex as well. As he grows up and becomes a teenager, his mothers words become confusing for him. Alans obssesion with the horses is actually a distinctive result of his mothers wordsDora. I used to tell him a funny thing about falling off horses. Did you sock that when Christian cavalry first appeargond in the New World, the pagans imagination horse and jump onr was one person?Dysart. Re ally?Alan. (sitting up, amazed) One person?Dora. Actually, they thought it must be a god.Alan. A godDora. It was only when one rider fell off, they realized the truth.Dysart. Thats fascinating. I neer heard that before . . . Can you remember anything else like that you may have told him about horses.Dora. Well, not really. They are in the Bible of course. He saith among the trumpets, Ha, ha.Dysart. Ha, ha? (Equus 11)Dora has as well let Alan watch some Western studys without his fathers knowledge (Equus 12). She is the one in the play introducing the word genus Equus stating that it is a Latin word for horse by which Alan is fascinated since he has not heard a word with two Us (Equus 12). As for Frank, he has never approved of his wife teaching Alan Bible since he is an atheist. For Frank, Alans psychology has been corrupted because of Doras teachings of Bible.Alan has been having nightmares in which he keeps saying Ek . . . Ek . . .Ek (Equus 14). Dysart first tries psychotherapy to learn the tenablenesss for Alans problems. However, those therapies then reveal some interesting clues about Dysarts own problems. Alan is a clever boy and he tries to work on Dysarts psychology in the way Dysart doesDysart. Do you dream often?Alan. Yes, do you?Dysart. Yes. Do you have a special dream?Alan. No. Do you?Dysart. Yes. What was your dream about last night?Alan. depository financial institution remember. Whats yours about?Dysart. I said the truth.Alan. Thats the truth. Whats yours about? The special one.Dysart. Carving up children. (Equus 14)Shapiro who analyzes the play technically, suggests for the relationship between Dysart and AlanThe symbolic aspect is in the phrases Dysart uses to set the convulsion in motion. What they symbolize is Dysarts dishonesty, as Alans symbolic event also revealsAlan is playing a symbolic event with an iconic, truculent aspect, the object of which is the audiences recognition of Dysarts dishonesty In this case the audience knows fr om the Nurses previous indexical event that Dysart knew about Alans nightmares. Thus, they should recognize that Dysart began the interview with a lie. Consequently, the interview burnnot proceed until Alan turns indexical. He will do this erst Dysart becomes truthful. Hence, Alan suggests that they interview each other. (Shapiro 111)In the tenth setting of the first act, the audience is again introduced to a flashback. During this second therapy, Alan goes back to the time when he was six years oldHorseman. Whoa . . . Whoa there Whoa . . Sorry I didnt chat you . . . Did I scare you?Alan. NoHorseman. (looking cumulation at him) Thats a terrific castleAlan. Whats his name?Horseman. Trojan. You can stroke him, if you like. He wont mind. (Equus 19)In this scene Alans parents arrive and warn the horseman. His father takes him from the horsemans shoulders and they get angry with the horseman. Frank who is strictly against riding horses is sad to inflict Alan hurt, so far Alan is glad to have ridden a horse. He explains his act saying I indirect requested to laugh (Equus 20). It is here clear that Alan as a boy, demands to have joy no matter how his parents think. It is the passion destroyed by his parents.What Dysart really wants to learn is the reason wherefore Alan blinded the six horses in the stable. As a psychiatrist, Dysart wants to go into the deepest places of Alans psychology in pitch to give some hatching to this act of Alan. However, Alan neither explains why he blinded the horses nor tells something that can help Dysart adjust some reason behind it. He continues playing with the psychiatrist.In the eleventh scene we are told that Alan, when he was twelve, insisted on buying the picture of Christ ludicrous down with chains with his pocket money, and hanging it at the foot of his bed where he could see it last thing at night (Equus 21). However, Frank, the atheist father tore and threw it away. Instead of the picture, he put a photograph o f a horse which made Alan happy.In the fifteenth scene, Dysart has finally managed to have to a greater extent clues about Alans situation. He has learnt from Frank about a girl in Alans life and decided to ask some questions about the stable. Alan takes the audience to the previous year when he first talked to Jill a middle-class girl in her early twenties. At this time, Alan is working in a shop and Jill has come to the shop in narrate to buy some blades for a c flangeping machine to clip horses (Equus 29). Jill is working in a stable owned by Harry Dalton. She suggests Alan ride horses however Alan is here hesitant since he knows his parents would be against it. He finally agrees to go to the stable and meet Dalton. As soon as he arrives the stable, Dalton tells him about the horses and teaches him how to ride a horse. Here we are introduced to Nugget, a horse which will soon have an important part in the play. When Alan is left alone with the horses in the stable, his passion returns. What Dysart wants to learn is whether Alan had a date with Jill however Alan is again escapist in his answers and he instead tries to question Dysart about his own dates. It is in scene seventeen where the audiences come to realize the inner conflict of Dysart. Alan tries to catch Dysart from his weakest point. Dysart has never had any sexual relationship with any women in his life, including his wife. He is nervous when he is asked why he does not have any children and suddenly needs cigarettes. His soliloquy in this scene is a clear evidence about this psychiatrists psychologyWhat am I, then? . . . Wicked little bastard Alan knew exactly what questions to try. Hed actually marched himself round the hospital, making enquiries about my wife. Wicked and of course, perceptive. Ever since I made that crack about carving up children, hes been aware of me in an absolutely specific way. Of course, there is nothing novel in that. Advanced neurotics can be dazzling at that game. They aim unswervingly at your area of maximum vulnerability. . . Which I suppose is as good a way as any of describing Margaret. (Equus 32)The next scene reveals Dysarts problems with his wife Margaret. Dysart explains Hesther why they did not have any children. He blames Margaret for this. He states that Margaret sits beside their salmonpink, glazed brick fireplace, and knits things for orphans for him, his wife is a domestic monster who is the Shrinks Shrink (Equus 34). While Dysart likes to read about Ancient Greece, Margaret hates such things. Their marriage is including two different persons, being very similar to Alans parents marriage. Shaffer prefers to give this marriage from one point of view that of the husband. We never meet the wife. Dysart is unhappy and uncomfortable in his marriage. He tells his friend, HestherDo you know what its like for two people to live in the alike(p) house as if they were in different parts of the world? Mentally, shes always in some drizzl y kirk of her own inheriting and Im in some Doric temple clouds snap throuh pillars eagles bearing prophecies out of the sky. (Equus 34)In this scene Dysart seems to cure himself it is his confrontation with his own confused psychology. He is obsessed with the concept of normal. According to Hesther, Dysart is trying to restore Alan to a normal life and Dysart is confused when he thinks about the meaning of normal and being a normal person. For Hesther, it is the smile in a childs eyes (Equus 35), and for Dysart, it is also the dead stare in a million adults (Equus 36). Rosefeldt explains Dysarts psychology as followsMore than any other character, Dysart is aware that he is trapped in a chain of substitutions. Dysart longs to reach the passion of pagan worship. His wife reduces the sacred acrobats to absurred 50 freaks and equates the heroes of the Iliad with ruffians 50. He cries out, Oh the primitive world. . . what instinctual truths were lost with it 50. Alienated and alone, Dysart knows he has lost contact with these primitive truths and is hopelessly trying to regain them. For communicating with the gods, Dysart substitutes the vicarious experience of reading books on the cultural shelf 50. Instead of reaching up to the gods, he brings home Kodachrome snaps of hinge on Olympus 50. The power of the gods rests in the Hellenic pantheonAlso, Dysart touches a counterpart statue of Dionysus 50. The power and essence of the god is replaced by the physical presence of the god, which is replaced by the statue of the god, which is replaced by a reproduction of the statue. (Rosefeldt 92)Dysart, in order to learn more about Alan, now chooses hypnosis technique and Alans problems are revealed as followsDysart. Now, Alan, youre going to answer questions Im going to ask you. Do you deduct?Alan. Yes.Dysart. Good. Now I want you to think back in time. You are on that beach you told me about. The tide has gone out, and youre making sandcastles. Above you, staring d own at you, is that great horses head, and the cream dropping from it. Can you see that?Alan.Yes.Dysart.You ask him a question. Does the chain hurt?Alan.Yes.Dysart. Do you ask him aloud?Alan. No.Dysart. And what does the horse say back?Alan.Yes.Dysart.Then what do you say?Alan.Ill take it for you.Dysart. And he says?Alan.It never comes out. They have me in chains.Dysart.Like Jesus?Alan.YesDysart.Only his name isnt Jesus, is it?Alan.No.Dysart.What is it?Alan.No one knows but him and me.Dysart.You can tell me, Alan. Name him.Alan. Equus. (Equus 37)Alan is now unconscious with the gist of hypnosis. In his imagination, the horse is chained like Jesus. Now it is clear that Alans imagination has been influenced by his mothers teachings of Bible as utter before by Frank. For Alan, Equus lives in all horses and is chained because of the sins of the world (Equus 38). When Alan goes back to the time he was twelve, looking at the picture of Equus, Dysart asks him questions about the stable. The stable is the temple of Equus where Alan washes and brushes him. Equus wants to be ridden by Alan but he does not show Alan how to ride him He showed me nothing Hes a mean bugger Ride or fall Thats Straw Law (Equus 39).Equus is no pagan idol he is unmistakably the Judeo-Christian God, born in the stubble 39 (stable of Bethlehem) and wearing the sandals 40 of Christ. As Christ suffered for mankind, Equus takes the punishment for Alans sake. The Ark of the Covenant symbolizing the contract between God and man becomes the Ark of the Manbit 41, which Alan holds in his mouth. The lump of sugar becomes Equus Last Supper 42. Alan beckons Equus, Take my sins. Eat them for my sake 43. Equus is Jesus, the Son of God, the Redeemer who takes away the sins of the world. Just as Christ launched his attack against the House of Mammon, Alan launches Equus against their vernacular foes The Hosts of Philco and The Hosts of Remington, the rulers of the shallow and materialistic world of substit utions. Equus is Alans redeemer, the Godslave 43. (Rosefeldt 92)Alan rode Equus every three weeks in Daltons stable. He stole the stables keys and went there secretly to ride Equus. Dysart wants Alan to remember a scene in the stable He throws out his arms and shows himself fully to his God, bowing himself before Nugget (Equus 41). Alan is pleased to touch Nugget but he is distressed when he remembers his eyes. He gives Nuggets sugar, the last supper before Ha ha. Here Alan whispers his Gods name ceremonially Alan. Equus . . . Equus . . .Equus (Equus 42), and he says Stay, Equus. No-one said Go . . . Thats it. Hes good. Equus the Godslave. Faithful and true(42).The Equus voice increases in volumeAlan. (Shouting) WEE . . . WAA . . . WONDERFUL . . .Im stiff Stiff in the windMy mane, stiff in the windMy flanks My hoovesMane on my legs, on my flanks, like whipsRawRawIm raw RawFeel me on you On you On youI want to be in youI want to BE you forever and ever Equus, I spot youNow Bear me a wayMake us One personHe rides Equus insanely (Equus 44)The end of Act I is the climax, a strange combination of religion and sexuality. Equus is now the god that rules Alan. The word AMEN ends Act I (Equus 44).In Act II, Frank is interestingly absent in the play. (That may be symbolic but we do not know why). Dora seems to realize her faults in rising Alan. She comes to see that it is not the child but the parent who is faulty. She sees Alan as a little victim who has done nothing at all (Equus 47). However in her speech to Dysart, she strangely puts the blame on Alan and blames Dysart for questioning her family as if they are guiltyDora. (ignoring him more and more urgently) Look, Doctor you dont have to live with this. Alan is one patient to you one out of many. Hes my son. I lie awake every night thinking about it. Neither of us sleeps all night. You come to us and say Who forbids telecasting? Who does what behind whose back? as if we are criminals. Let me tell you something. Were not criminals. Weve done nothing wrong. We loved Alan. We gave him the best love we could. All right, we quarrel sometimes all pparents quarrel we always make it up. My husband is a good man. Hes an upright man, religion or no religion. He cares for his home, for the world, and for his boy. Alan had love and care and treats, and as much fun as any boy in the world. I know about loveless homes I was a teacher. Our home wasnt loveless. I know about privacy, too not invading a childs privacy. All right, Frank may be at fault there he digs into him too much but nothing in excess. Hes not a bully . . . (Equus 47)This speech of Dora reveals both her and Franks faults although she typically insists that they have been good parents to Alan. Shaffer uses this technique for many characters in this play in order to be effective The character is here revealing herself through her own words that is to say Shaffer lets the character talk about herself in order to achieve objectivity. Do ra, the religious mother lastly puts the blame on the Devil thinking that Devil came to Alan. She is portrayed as a typical irresponsible mother who is unaware of the process her son grows up I only knew he was my little Alan, and then the Devil came (47). Both of the parents fail in dealing with their teenager son. It is a step of Alan for adolescence in which Alan is learning about life. Parents quarrelling is not something as trivial as Dora thinks. It really affects the child since he remain between two different versions of beliefs, two different truths those of the mother and of the father.Alans crisis has in fact begun when Jill Mason attempted to seduce him one night when Alans horse god, Equus was there in the stable. Alan blinds six horses with a metal spike (Equus 3) in the second act of the play and it is seen as a consequence of his guilt and shame. Although he does not want to remember anything about Jill, Dysart makes him tell about all at last. It is the most impor tant flashback after the one about Equus. Dysart encourages Alan to remember it in order to get over it. Everything begins with Jills inviting Alan out. Although he has to go home, he accepts her offer and they go to the cinema. At the cinema, Alan tells Jill, there was no girl except for her. Soon, it is understood that the film is a pornographic one. Dysart asks him Was that the first time youd seen a girl naked? and Alan says Yes (Equus 58). Then suddenly, Alan realizes that his father is at the cinema, too. With the fear of being caught at such a film, he tries to hide himself.When he is caught, Frank shouts at Alan and the three leave the cinema. Outside, Alan tries to speak to his fatherAlan. I I Ive never been there before. Honest . . . neer . . .(to Dysart) He didnt seem to hear. Jill tried.Jill. Its true, Mr.Strang. It wasnt Alans idea to go there. It was exploit. (Equus 59)Alan. (to Dysart) The bus wouldnt come. We just stood and stood . . . Then suddenly he spoke.Fran k. (stiffly) Id like you to know something. Both of you. I came here this evening to see the Manager. He asked me to call on him for business purposes. I happen to be a printer, Miss A picture house needs posters. Thats on the whole why Im here. To discuss posters. While I was waiting I happened to glance in, thats allI had no idea they showed films like this. Im certainly going to refuse my services.Jill. (kindly) Yes, of course.Frank. So long as thats understood. (Equus 59)Interestingly enough, Frank explains why he himself is there instead of asking Alan why he is there. He has certainly come to the cinema for the selfsame(prenominal) reason with Alan and Jill. Thus Alan and Frank are scared of each other. Frank leaves them and Alan stays with Jill. More importantly, Alan has been now introduced to the adult life with the film. He wants to make love with Jill. She takes Alan to the Stables because they cannot go to Alans or Jills house. Alan does not want to go to the Stables he prefers a home.Alan. Why not your place?Jill. I cant. Mother doesnt like me bringing boys back. I told you . . . Anyway, the Barns better.Alan. NoJill. All that straw. Its cosy.Alan. NoJill. Why not?Alan. ThemJill. Dalton will be in bed . . . Whats the matter? . . . Dont you want to?Alan. (aching to) YesJill. So?Alan. (desperate) Them . . . Them . . .Jill. Who?Alan. (low) Horses.Jill. Horses? . . .Youre really dotty, arent you? . . . What do you mean?He starts shakingOh youre freezing . . . Lets get under the straw. Youll be warm there.Alan. (pulling away) No (Equus 62)Alan does not want to be seen by the horses since he thinks it would be a shameful act according to his religion. Although Jill shuts all the doors in order not to be seen by the horses, he is not comfortable. Alan cannot help but think of Equus and he sees Equus instead of Jill. Thus, his attempt to make love with Jill fails. Angrily, he shouts at Jill Get out (Equus 65). His psychology in this scene is horribleAl an. (to Dysart) He was there. Through the door. The door was shut, but he was there . . .Dysart. Laughing?Alan. (to Dysart) Mocking . . .Mocking . . .Standing downstage he stares up towards the tunnel. A great silence weighs on the square.(To the silenceterrified) Friend . . . Equus the Kind . . . The merciful . . .Forgive me . . .Silence.It wasnt me Not really me. Me. . . Forgive me . . .Take me back again Please . . . PLEASE (He kneels on the downstage lip of the square, still facing the door, huddling in fear) Ill never do it again. I swear . . . I swear . . .Dysart. And He? What does He say?Alan. (to Dysart whispering) Mine . . . Youre mine . . . I am yours and you are mine . . . (Equus 67)Equuss Nuggets eyes are rolling and Alan is sure that he has seen them make love. Eyes . . . White eyes . . . never close Eyes like flames coming coming . . .God seest God seest . . . NO . . . (Equus 68). Alan stabs out Nugget and other five horses eyes. He yells in hysteria as he collaps es on the ground (Equus 68).Dysart is about to finish his process of normalizing Alan. However he does not know whether he should be happy to have this patient cured. He calls it folly (Equus 68). In the end, Dysart appears to have cured him.Equus is a troubling play about a psychiatrists struggle to understand the passionately conceived but torturous personal mythology of Alan, a disturbed adolescent. If a psychologist of religion had gone after the young mans associations to G-o-d, he or she might have retrieved references to the pallid secondhand God of Alans parents, but would plausibly have missed Alans dramatic psychic creation of a personal diety he called Equus. Although it might be argued that this is the kind of exceptional case that falls more into the psychopathology of religion and is no basis for generalization, I am more and more struck by how distinctive and sometimes quite original are the spiritual formulations of individuals. (Mc Dargh 90)The play really include s the idea of passion versus reason. It is about a psychiatrist who thinks he can solve everything by reason and at the same time about an adolescent who is filled with passion but forced by his family to leave his passion. The battle of passion and reason in the case of Alan seems to end with the defeat of passion however, Shaffer certainly prefers a combination of two. It is not only Alans but also becomes the inner conflict of Dysart. While the horses represent freedom and sexuality, Martin Dysart represents reason as a doctor. During the play, the two characters have difficult times. Dysart shows a change in his attitude towards passion. As for Alan, he is treated by the psychiatrist to become normal. Alan is caught up between his own creation of religion and what is expected by him. He has to feel himself acceptable (Equus 68) since reason rather than passion is what is accepted by society. Dysart lacks passion and is jealous of Alan (Equus 50) he is uncomfortable in this pro cess of normalizing. He gradually gets worried that he should not cure Alan because this would be the end of Alans passion, so he does not want to give an end to that passion which he lacks but desires. Dysart confesses to Hesther, that boy has known a passion more ferocious than I have ever felt in any second of my life. And let me tell you something I envy it (Equus 50). Dysart is thus obsessed with passion saying Passion, you see, can be destroyed by a doctor. It cannot be created (Equus 69).It is a disturbing play in which Shaffer makes use of sound effects to make it psychologically effective. The horses are performed by actors who wear horse masks. As for the scene props, Shaffer makes use of light in order to emphasize his themes (Innes 228). Light is used in the play as an indication of Alans psychology. There are dream sequences, and a scenic structure that cuts across the logic of time as well as cause and effect following the irrational associations of the subconscious, p lus ritual chanting, stylized masks and mythic archetypes (Innes 228). Shaffer ignores the three unities of Aristotle there are scenes belonging to different places and different times and there is no unity of action. However, Shaffer directly connects the past action of the play to the plot of present events and the scenery connects more with the psychological life of the character than to the surface plot.As for the setting, it changes from scene to scene it is both internal and external even in a single scene being both internal and external. It begins when Alan is seventeen years old and goes back to the previous years.The point of view is also variable Shaffer lets the audience see the things from each characters point of view and Shaffer uses the omniscient narrator in order to emphasize each point of view. The play is about an adolescent who has deep complicated conflicts in his relationships with his parents and his first flirt Jill. The play is not only an extremely usefu l source book for an understanding of madness and family processes, it is also an affirmation of the dramatherapists long-held credo that art can tell us things that science cannot (Davis xiii). Shaffer is successful at portraying the psychology of characters and Equus is a good work of drama in which the themes of passion, reason and worship and the idea of normal and abnormal are associate by Shaffer in order to make his audience question their beliefs and society.

Chances of Winning the Lottery

Chances of Winning the LotteryIntroductionIve already won a 100 dollars in the order draft, and hardly anyone attains that a lot twice. So, Im not likely to win that much again. This statement has been said by numerous mass who has played the lottery and those who continues to play the lottery seeking a chance to become an instant succeeder for coin that on just dreams close on a daily basis. To break it down, the chances of winsome thee Lotto jackpot are roughly 1 in 3.5 million, or that the overall chances of winning any prize in the Lotto games are about 1 in 20. So why do community all over the world play the Lotto?When it comes to the Lotto it comes down to luck, it is nice when a soul wins money playing the Lottery and the ore a person plays the better the odds for them, so technically there is a chance to win money twice buy playing the Lottery. In 2014 deal in 44 states spent about 70 billion dollars playing the Lotto, so it is safe to label that someone withi n those 44 states hit some type of Lotto money twice no matter how small or large the issue forth was.In March 2014, The Palm Beach Post news motif revealed that concomitant Florida jackpot winners, many of them store owners or operators, defied incredible odds to claim thousands of dollars in winnings. The most prolific winners cashed in tickets worth $600 or more every 11 days. March 2017, Jeffrey Stinson. Just from this statement alone we can pretty much say that there is a good chance to win some type of Lotto money twice especially if you are a serial Lotto player like the people in Florida.Four people who won two or more lotteries. St counterbalance Ontell (right) of New Jersey Melvyn Wilson, a four-time winner in Virginia Connie Cottingham, who won twice in Indiana and Delma Kinney, who won $1 million twice in Georgia. None of them won nearly as much as Joan Ginther, who won $5.4 million, $2 million, $3 million and $10 million in Texas. 2014, Peter Mucha Philly.com.thither are many stories about how many people have won the Lotto twice and more. It makes you wonder how is this happening when there are people how has played the Lotto all their life and has not won at all. If a person has won a hundred dollars in the state Lottery after reading about the people in this paper who has won big money twice, I think the odds are good for a person to win the state Lotto for a hundred dollars a second time.Lottery history is full of mind-boggling examples of winners winning again. Thats one reason the Texas Lottery never investigated Joan Ginther, who won $5.4 million in a 1993 Lotto Texas drawing and then hit it big in three scratch-off games, $2 million in Holiday Millionaire in 2006, $3 million in Millions Millions in 2008, and $10 million in $140,000,000 Extreme Payoff in 2010.Still, the $20.4 million she won tops not only cases involving seemingly normal players, it even beats examples involving crooks or master mathematicians. An MIT group, for example , mined the Massachusetts lottery for seven years, and reportedly won $3.5 million. 2014, Peter Mucha Philly.com. This kind of make you wonder if a person can be this lucky, or is there so type of criminal activity that happen, and at the end of the day is the Lottery crooked.The evidence clearly proves that people can and will continue to win the Lotto multiple times throughout the United States. Questions will continue to rise are people just that lucky, is there Lotto scams through the States and why is playing the Lottery so addictive to so many people. No matter what there will continuously be a difference in opinion when it comes to this topic between the so, called experts.Conclusion The question at the end of the day will continue to be argued even though there seems to be overwhelming proof that a person can win the Lotto multiple times in ones life. There are some people in the world that could care less about the argument or debate but for the millions or even billions of people who plays the Lotto on a daily basis trying to become rich quick by either scratching or playing different numbers will continue to play. So, to the person who won a hundred dollars in the State Lottery, and hardly thinks anyone wins that much twice, and thinks he/she will not win that much again. Please read the stories of people who have broken all the odds win it comes to the Lotto.Referenceswww.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2015/1/www.lottonumbers.com/lotto-odds-calculator.aspwww.philly.com//lottery/multiple_winners_in_lottery_history.htmlSome Lottery Retailers queer the Odds and Cost States (January 27, 2015 By Jeffrey Stinson)

American Public Education Essay examples -- School Education

The American public educational establishment is filled with an assortment of problems. Most students are graduating with less(prenominal) knowledge and capability than similar students in other industrialized countries. Classroom disruptions are surprisingly common, and in some classrooms, nearly continuous. The public education system is having difficulty adjusting to the no child left behind act. The No Child Left Behind(NCLB) is a landmark in education reform designed to modify student achievement and change the culture of Americans schools. The primary sponsors of NCLB were President George W. Bush and Sen. Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts, a decades-long advocate for raising the quality of public education. This integrity was signed in 2001. Unfortunately not everything was taken into consideration for the long term affect. There needs to be a middle ground for personalized square offing because each child learns at a different pace. According to LdPride.com there are roug hly three different types of learning styles ranging from visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. Visual learners learn through pictures and visually stimulation. Auditory learners learn though sound and music. While kinesthetic learn through hands on material. So while you whitethorn have a teacher standing up giving history lessons though a lecture, only the auditory learns are really picking up what the lesson is.The education system should be one that meets the needs of the parents, the teachers, and the students. The view point of all involved should be taken into consideration through the entire process. During the cultivation 10 years, there has been an explosion in our knowledge of ways in which humans develop and learn. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2002(NCLB) was initi... ...LB) was passed with unfluctuating bipartisan backing by the House of Representatives on December 13, 2001 by a ballot of 381-41, and by the Senate on December 18, 2001 by a vote of 87 -10. President George W. Bush signed it into law on January 8, 2002.Americas Promise Alliance 1110 Vermont Avenue, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005The New York Times Dropout Rates for Minority Students Keep revolt in CitiesPublished September 28, 1994SOURCE U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The Condition of Education 2010 (NCES 2010-028)1990 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006, USA telephone set (202) 502-7300 U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellingswww2.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2007/03/03122007.html http//www.ldpride.net/learningstyles.MI.htmhttp//www.ndt-ed.org/TeachingResources/ClassroomTips/Learning_Styles.htm

Hamlet’s Best Friend, Horatio Essay -- Essays on Shakespeare Hamlet

Hamlets Best Friend, Horatio The Shakespearean drama Hamlet shows much deception and crime. Few friendships in the play survive boulder clay the end. But Hamlet and Horatio, best of friends, are not even separated by the heros death. This essay will elaborate on this relationship. A.C. Bradley in Shakespearean Tragedy notes a problem involving Horatio in Shakespeares Hamlet When Horatio, at the end of the soliloquy, enters and greets Hamlet, it is evident that he and Hamlet have not latterly met at Elsinore. Yet Horatio came to Elsinore for the funeral (I.ii. 176). Now even if the funeral took place some three weeks ago, it seems rather strange that Hamlet, however absorbed in grief and however go from the Court, has not met Horatio. . . (368). Marchette Chute in The Story Told in Hamlet describes Horatios part in the opening scene of the play The story opens in the frosty and dark of a winter iniquity in Denmark, while the guard is being changed on the battlements of the royal castle of Elsinore. For two nights in succession, just as the bell strikes the hour of one, a ghost has appeared on the battlements, a figure dressed in complete armor and with a face like that of the knackered king of Denmark, Hamlets father. A young man named Horatio, who is a school friend of Hamlet, has been told of the apparition and cannot believe it, and one of the officers has brought him there in the night so that he can see it for himself. The hour comes, and the ghost walks (35). Horatio, frightened, futilely confronts the ghost What art thou that usurpst this time of night, Together with that fair and warlike clay In which the majesty of buried Denma... ...Don Nardo. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 1999. Excerpted from Stories from Shakespeare. N. p. E. P. Dutton, 1956. Granville-Barker, Harley. Place and Time in Hamlet. Readings on The Tragedies. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 1996. Reprint from Prefaces to Shakespeare. vol.1. Princeton, NJ P rinceton University P., 1946. Levin, Harry. General Introduction. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. Boston Houghton Mifflin Co., 1974. Mack, Maynard. The World of Hamlet. Yale Review. vol. 41 (1952) p. 502-23. Rpt. in Shakespeare Modern Essays in Criticism. Rev. ed. Ed. Leonard F. Dean. New York Oxford University P., 1967. Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1995. http//www.chemicool.com/Shakespeare/hamlet/full.html No line nos.

My Teaching Philosophy Statement :: Teaching Teachers Education Essays

My Teaching Philosophy Statement The teaching profession is one of coarse stature. The public views this c beer as very respectable, even little children one dream of one day becoming a teacher. Teachers are special batch that have the opportunity to touch and change hundreds of lives over the course of their own. Those wishing to make a difference in the world today will learn that teaching is the way to do that. These, along with many others, are the reasons behind my choice to become a teacher. My philosophical stance regarding education is very eclectic. My views are not a mix of just two or three stances but instead all four. I am very much an dreamer in the respect that I believe it is essential for a teacher to know their glut. Students know when a teacher is highly educated in the content they are teaching. I believe that teachers will have more respect and class involvement from their students if the students view them as well educated. My realistic views relate to having schoolroom management plan that is dictated in the beginning. I believe that the teacher should be seen as the ruler of the classroom. Students should be told up front what is expected from them throughout the course of the year, and explained the purpose for proper behavior and order in the classroom. If these rules are dictated at the very beginning of the year it will be comfortable to punish those who fail to follow rules. I am also an existentialist in the since that I feel students should be given some choices, maybe not so much in the rules of the classroom, but in the ways in which they want to learn. Some children learn better in groups, some prefer workforce on activities and others like to get material out of a textbook. I believe children should get to choose how they would like to complete certain assignments. Last I feel I am somewhat a pragmatist.

Human Life And World Essay -- Philosophy Emotions Papers

Human Life And WorldI dispute the claim that the disclosure of the life-world by phenomenology is an accomplishment of permanent significance. By briefly reviewing the meaning of the world and life-world in the writings of Husserl, Gurwitsch, Schutz-Luckmann, Ortega, Heidegger, Jonas, Straus, Sartre and Merleau-Ponty, I show that they all treat the world, or rather the affairs which comprise it, as passively present whether viewed as a mental acquisition or as the Other. But the meaning of the world-as that wherein are met physical demands upon us which must be at rest if we are to continue living-cannot be considered either as a mental acquisition or as something that is other and over against us. A living universe as living cannot fail to attend to the agency of the affairs of which the life-world consists, as well as ones own exploring and coping actions. If we are to really speak of life, thus we must acknowledge the mutual and reciprocal activities of living beings and world. Gurwitsch has written that the disclosure of the life-world by phenomenology is an accomplishment of permanent significance. (1974, 12) But is such a claim justifiable? I believe it is not. I shall briefly examine first the way transcendental and then existential phenomenologists understand the meaning of world or life-world and how the world is to be experienced as such, and I shall critique the views of each in turn.The appropriate philosopher with which to begin an examination of any major phenomenological theme is most certainly Husserl. We as objects and subjects find ourselves in our conscious activities in a pre-given world existing for all in common according to Husserl. This world, always already there, is the univ... ...ng beings and world. ReferencesDewey, John, Reconstruction in Philosophy, Boston, 1957.Dubos, Rene, The Torch of Life, unused York, 1962.Gurwitsch, Aron, Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology, Evanston, 1966.Gurwitsch, Aron, Phenomenology and the Theory of Science, Evanston, 1974.Husserl, Edmund, Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Evanston, 1970.Jonas, Hans, The Phenomenon of Life, New York, 1966.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, London, 1962.Ortega y Gasset, Jose, Phenomenology and Art, New York, 1975.Schutz, Alfred, and Luckmann, Thomas, Structures of the Life-World, 2 vols., Evanston, 1973 and 1989.Shotter, John, Social Accountability and Selfhood, Oxford, 1984.Straus, Erwin, Aesthesiology and Hallucinations, in Existence, ed. by May, Angel, Ellenberger, New York, 1958.

Masculinity in Men Should Weep by Ena Lamont Stewart and Perfect Days b

Masculinity in Men Should Weep by Ena Lamont Stewart and Perfect Days by Liz Loc fountainheadBoth operates portray custody under a cast out light. In Men Should Weepmen be the dominant sex and are seen socially of far greaterimportance. Whereas in Perfect days men are easily manipulated andtend to be controlled by the contents of their trousers.Men Should Weep is a play which examines how the family unitcrumbles under the pressure of poverty. John the incur of thefamily is the main male figure throughout the play. His wife Maggiedoes everything for him and their family. However although there isalways a lot to be done John man senesces not to do anything to help as hewould never want to damage his alter ego. Not only doesnt he helparound the house just now he is also unemployed. This says a lot aboutJohns character and implies that he is a selfish self-centredcharacter.Id an stem a was heid o this hooseAlthough John gives the family no support in anyway he is still quiteconte nt in thinking that he is head of the household. Due to the waysociety was at this time it implied that women had to do as theirhusbands told them. Once women married they were their husbandsproperty. Men in that day and age overruled women they were morepowerful and a lot of women feared them for various reasons. Domesticabuse was a main reason for this fear. Although a lot of women weredomestically abused it wasnt something they talked about. Mrs Boneone of the neighbours which are used as a vehicle to examine how menhave a hold over women in the play is a victim of domestic abuse.I just canna understand a women who lets her man bash her aboot..Standing up to men was unheard of you just wouldnt... ...Brendan doesnt know about. Grant is seento give Barbs a lot of happiness but their relationship ends withGrant asking.Why are you so ashamed of me?This portrays Grant as a very nave character as Barbs was only usinghim for a bit of fun the relationship as never serious, yet he looked upon it to be.In conclusion the portrayal of men and masculinity in two Scottishplays that I have studied are that they completely dominate thesociety. They are selfish self-absorbed characters.In Men Should Weep this is portrayed through John a veryself-absorbed character. I think the writers purpose was to show howbad the conditions were that people use to live in and some peoplestill do.In Perfect Days the men are portrayed to be very stupid and weakcharacters. I feel that the writers purpose was to show that womencan cope without men.